مجله پژوهش های اعتقادی کلامی
پیاپی 10 (تابستان 1392)

Tolerance means insouciance and relaxtion that unfortunately is expressed to Easy-Making And Coping.Ontological epistemological humanism modernism and the various interpretations of religion to legitimize the principles of tolerance which is claimed by some Western thinkers. It is important to clarify this issue because first this worid is not the same to Easy-Making And Coping and secondly it is not enough evidence.As the Islamic scholars want to connect to these words it is necessary to discuss the evidence. This discussion is important because modernism and secularism in schools think that the main reason for humanism is Easy-Making And Coping and consequently with the heavenly teachings are linked. The results of this study the contrast between this evidence and religion and that the Islamic principles do not believe that Easy-Making is accept false ideas and Easy-Making is to cope with the strong. the religion Easy-Making And Coping accepted limited and conditional. Easy-Making means tolerance for the peaceful coexistence of religions and Easy-Making means ignore individual rights and no place in social rights and divine.

Mystical anthropology is one of the most significant virtues of Mowlavi's thought in his famous book, Mathnavi. Hence, one of his attempts is to study two human's material and spiritual dimensions and their effects. Mowlavi distinguishes human from other beings due to his/her virtues like reason, freedom, freewill and love, and considers for him/her a high position and as the most noble creature and God's caliphate that seeking perfection is one of his/her basic tendencies. In Mowlavi's mystical anthropology perfect human finds central place due to his/her higher virtues. Mowlavi studies perfect human from ontological, epistemic, moral, political and social aspects. From ontological aspect, he/she is who has get the final real perfection, and can guide people, and from epistemic one, has completed his/her faculties and passed discursive philosophy and reached intuitive one. Also, he/she has traveled to divine paths in order to get last reality, and hence, has achieved to guide people in the form of Prophethood, Imamate, Mystical Guardianship in every time and can be as divine intermediary.

Islam provides a new way, a dynamic and engaging the best efforts of scientists and scholars of Islam is greater In the meantime, the great Muslim mystics, especially Eynolqozat Hamadani Through that experience, intuitive and appealing hobby verses, Hadiths and Islamic traditions, important facts and moments leading to relegate Islam. After the introduction of the study, the main component is divided into five sections and The library and documentation methods developed. Component of the "witnesses", the seeker is advised "La ilaha" give up and tell the truth 'Ellallah' reach. The prayer component stresses The second type of prayer, a slave with the provisions of such intention, reflection, prayer Book of Secrets, The Secret of inward and outward purity and the need to engage with God. The third component of the "Poorrate" the treasure of Divine Mercy interpreted It appears that the prophets of God gentlefolks. The element "Fast", the only means to-day life and dedicated to God It also introduced the visage of God and breakfast. The fifth pillar is also emphasized Pilgrimage is truly innocent of any directions And is located right in the heart of a step. Finally, the According to the teachings Hamadani Muslims Must give full faith in your heart and God will show. And so they praised him See if he.

he issue of temporal eternity and coming into being of the universe deals with the question whether the universe existed from the pre-eternity or has had a temporal beginning, which have long discussed by Muslim and non-Muslim. The present paper conducts a historical analysis of the issue in the history of theology with emphasis on views of the most famous theologians from different schools. It seems that the history of this issue dates back to ancient Greece and it has been discussed in the history of theology since its beginning. Although it is thought that theologians have unanimously emphasized on the temporal coming into being of the universe, the historical reanalysis of the issue shows theologian's different approaches in this regard.

if you not specisy the criteria changes tfkransan thought necessary havqayd con bashd my continued hnzchnd decades had passed since the addvent of Islam the veligion that beg an between veligous sects the correct diagnoss was incorrect kardshvar.There sore we need to developscience thsas.vmzanb disserent Islamic sects easily recognizea able.There are Various sactors that can contribute to prejudice Drpydaysh disserent vmzanb blind tribal misunderstanding vkj thinking of compiling hadith prohibition against the letter ant the name ofijtinad.The sollowing sactore were considered in the history vmzanb disserent beliess as nonexpressed aversion task vnabsamany uncoscious wisdow of social and economic change in Iran had a role in shaping.

Confronting the mystics, there emerge two extremes, one considering their words as revelations presenting, as proof, a single quoted verse or aphorism and some fiercely resisting them justifying their position by traditions cited against Sufism and the other opposite them severly and deny and result mystics such as Molavi, Attar, Hafez and… and justify their position with some the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt (A.S) in scorning of Sufism. This essay try to answer this question: does following of Ahle Beyt necessitate neglecting a lot of Irani-Islamic inheritance? Or we can find similar thought in the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt(A.S).Since this question is up to date and disputed the importance of this question Increace because not neglect of the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt(A.S)is acceptable nor laying aside a lot of Irani-Islamic inheritance is correct. The purpose of this essay is investigation of the extend of conformity between the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt(A.S) and mystic states and positions then conclude that a lot of mystic words conform with the aphorisms made by the Ahle Beyt(A.S) and the words uttered by mystical and Household signify mostly, a common point of view and they can be relied upon and the narration ascribed to the Ahle Beyt cited in opposition to Sufism are indicative of the deviation occasionally occurring in Sufism..